Home
Subscriber Notice
ETF Payer Notice
Case Documents
Contact Counsel

Notice of Pendency of Class Action

Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda

IF YOU PAID OR WERE CHARGED AN EARLY
TERMINATION FEE ON YOUR PERSONAL CELL PHONE
WITH A CALIFORNIA AREA CODE AND CALIFORNIA
BILLING ADDRESS BY VERIZON WIRELESS, SPRINT
AND/OR NEXTEL, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT MAY AFFECT
YOUR RIGHTS

A California Court authorized this notice.  This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

  • Cellphone customers in California have sued Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon Wireless”), Sprint PCS (“Sprint”) and Nextel alleging that these companies violated California law by charging early termination fees to their customers.

  • The Court has allowed the lawsuit to be a class action on behalf of all persons who had a wireless telephone personal account with Verizon Wireless, Sprint and/or Nextel with a California area code and a California billing address who were charged and/or paid an early termination fee from July 23, 1999 to March 18, 2007.

  • The Court has not decided whether Verizon Wireless, Sprint or Nextel did anything wrong.  There is no money available now, and no guarantee there will be.  However, your legal rights are affected, and you have a choice to make now:
Your Legal Rights and Options

What Is This?

The Court has certified these lawsuits as class actions.  The lawsuits challenge the collection of early termination fees.

Do Nothing

Stay in the lawsuit.  Await the outcome.  Give up your ability to individually sue Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel challenging early termination fees.

If you do nothing and stay in the lawsuit, you may receive money or benefits that may come after trial or settlement, or nothing but either way you give up any rights to sue Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel separately concerning the same legal claims as this lawsuit and you will be bound by all orders the Court enters and any judgment reached in the case.

Exclude Yourself

Get out of this lawsuit.  Get no benefits from this lawsuit.  Keep your right to sue Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel separately challenging early termination fees.

If you exclude yourself, you will no longer be part of these lawsuits.  If money or benefits are later awarded, you will receive none.  But, you keep any rights to sue Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel separately concerning the same legal claims as this lawsuit.

Regardless of whether you stay in the lawsuit or exclude yourself,
your cell phone service will not be affected.

  • Your options – and the deadlines to exercise them – are explained in this notice.  To ask to be excluded, you must act before June 15, 2007.

  • Lawyers must prove the claims against Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and Nextel at a trial. If money or benefits are obtained from Verizon Wireless, Sprint and/or Nextel, you will be notified about how to ask for a share.

  • Any questions?  Read on and visit www.cellphoneterminationfees.com.  Regardless of whether you stay in the lawsuit or exclude yourself, your cellphone service will not be affected.

Basic Information


1.     Why did I get this notice?

If you had personal cell phone service having a California area code and billing address with Verizon Wireless, Sprint and/or Nextel and were charged an early termination fee during the period July 23, 1999 through March 18, 2007, your rights may be affected.  This notice explains that the Court has allowed, or “certified,” a class action lawsuit that may affect you.  You have legal rights and options that you may exercise before the Court holds a trial.  The trial is to decide whether the claims being made against Verizon Wireless, Sprint and Nextel, on your behalf, are correct.  Judge Bonnie Sabraw of the Alameda County Superior Court is overseeing this class action.  The lawsuit is known as the Cellphone Termination Fee Cases, J.C.C.P. No. 4332.


2.     What is this lawsuit about?

This lawsuit is about the early termination fees charged to cell phone customers:  The class representatives claim that the early termination fees charged by Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel are unlawful and unfair penalties under California law.

Based upon these claims, the class representatives ask for changes in the companies’ practices and for damages and restitution of the early termination fees wrongfully collected.

Verizon Wireless, Sprint and Nextel deny that they did anything wrong and say that the early termination fees they charged to customers are not unlawful under California law. You can read the Answers of Verizon Wireless, Sprint and Nextel at www.cellphoneterminationfees.com.

Verizon Wireless, Sprint and Nextel have filed cross-complaints against the class representatives for damages that they contend they suffered as a result of early terminations of term contracts by members of the class.  The Court has ruled that, if it is determined that the early termination fees are unlawful, Verizon Wireless, Sprint and Nextel will be able to seek their actual damages.  The Court has ruled that any actual damages that Verizon Wireless, Sprint and Nextel are able to prove will be aggregated and then set off against any damages and restitution amounts that class members as a group are able to prove.  This may result in some class members being able to recover less in damages or restitution than they may be able to recover if they had brought an individual action against Verizon Wireless, Sprint or Nextel.

However, under the Court’s rulings, no class member would end up owing money to Verizon Wireless, Sprint or Nextel.  Plaintiffs have challenged the defendants’ right to assert cross-claims and will seek appellate review of the Court’s rulings.

The Court hasn’t decided whether the class representatives or the cell phone companies are correct.  Lawyers for the class must prove the claims against Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and Nextel at trial.


3.     Who is included in the Class?

You may be a member of the Class if between July 23, 1999 and midnight March 18, 2007, you paid or were charged one or more early termination fees charged by Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel for your personal cell phone account with a California area code and a California billing address.

Your Rights and Options

You have to decide whether to stay in the Class or ask to be excluded before the trial, and you have to decide this now.


4.     What happens if I do nothing at all?

You don’t have to do anything now if you want to keep the possibility of getting money or benefits from this lawsuit.  By doing nothing, you are staying in the Class.  If you stay in and the Class is awarded money or benefits, either as a result of the trial or a settlement, you will be notified about how to apply for a share.

Keep in mind that if you do nothing now, regardless of whether the Class Representatives win or lose the trial, you will not be able to separately sue, or continue to sue Verizon Wireless, Sprint and/or Nextel for the same legal claims that are the subject of this lawsuit.  You will also be legally bound by all of the Orders the Court issues and judgments the Court makes in this class action.


5.     Why would I ask to be excluded?

If you exclude yourself from the Class – which is sometimes called “opting-out” of the Class – you won’t get any money or benefits from this lawsuit.  However, you may then be able to separately sue or continue to sue Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel for the legal claims that are the subject of this lawsuit.  If you exclude yourself, you will not be legally bound by the Court’s judgments in this class action.

If you bring your own lawsuit against Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel after you exclude yourself, you will have to hire and pay your own lawyer for that lawsuit, and you will have to prove your claims.  If you do exclude yourself so you can start or continue your own lawsuit against Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel, you should talk to your own lawyer soon, because your claims may be subject to a statute of limitations.


6.     How do I exclude myself from the Class?

To exlude yourself from the Class, you must notify the Court at the address identified below in writing no later than June 15, 2007.

Your request for exclusion must contain:  (1) the name of this lawsuit, “In re Cell Phone Early Termination Fees, JCCP, No. 4332;”  (2) your full name and current address; (3) a clear statement of intention to exclude yourself such as “I wish to be excluded from the Class”; (4) your Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel cell phone number(s) when you paid the early termination fee; and (5) your signature.

Requests for exclusion must be postmarked no later than June 15, 2007, and sent to:

Superior Court of the State of California
Cell Phone Early Termination Fees Litigation
c/o RG/2 Claims Administration LLC
P.O. Box 59479
Philadelphia, PA  19102-9479

The Lawyers Representing You


7.     Do I have a lawyer in this case?

The Court decided that the law firm of Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, Bramson, Plutzik, Mahler & Berkhaeuser, LLP and the Franklin & Franklin, APC are qualified to represent all class members as class counsel.  These lawyers are experienced in handling similar cases against cell phone companies.  More information about class counsel is available at www.lerachlaw.com or www.bramsonplutzik.com.


8.     Should I get my own lawyer?

If you want to remain a member of the Class, but you do not wish to be represented by class counsel, you may enter an appearance through your own attorney at your own expense.  To do so, you must file an Entry of Appearance with the Clerk of the Court.  You will remain a class member with representation by your own attorney and you will be responsible for the fees and costs of your attorney.


9.     How will the lawyers be paid?

If Class counsel get money or benefits for the Class, they may ask the Court for fees and expenses.  You will not have to pay these fees and expenses.  If the Court grants class counsel’s request, the fees and expenses would be either deducted from any money obtained for the Class or paid separately by Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel.

The Trial


10.    How and when will the Court decide who is right?

As long as the case isn’t resolved by a settlement or otherwise, class counsel will have to prove the claims at a trial in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda.  If you want to attend, please call the Court Clerk to confirm the trial date, department and time.


11.    Do I have to come to the trial?

You do not need to attend the trial.  Class counsel will present the case for the Class members, and Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and/or Nextel will present the defenses.  You are welcome to come at your own expense.  If you wish to participate in the trial, you should contact class counsel.


12.    Will I get money after the trial?

If the Class obtains money or benefits as a result of the trial or a settlement, you will be notified about how to participate.  We do not know how long this will take.


13.    Additional Information

Complete copies of the pleadings, orders and other documents filed in this litigation may be examined and copied at any time during regular office hours at the offices of the Clerk of the Court, Alameda Superior Court, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland, California 94612.  The case is titled Cell Phone Early Termination Fees, JCCP, No. 4332.

Certain documents and other information are also available on the Internet at www.cellphoneterminationfees.com.

If you have any questions concerning anything discussed in this notice, or wish to provide us with your current name or address, please visit the website or write to Class counsel at:

LERACH COUGHLIN STOIA
   GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP
Jacqueline E. Mottek
100 Pine Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94111
www.lerachlaw.com

BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER
   & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP
Alan R. Plutzik
2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120
Walnut Creek, CA 94598

FRANKLIN & FRANKLIN, APC
J. David Franklin
550 West “C” Street, Suite 950
San Diego, CA 92101

PLEASE DO NOT CALL OR WRITE TO THE COURT FOR INFORMATION OR ADVICE.

DATED:  February 21, 2007 BY ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
ALAMEDA.